Guitar Review - Yamaha Guitalele GL-1
I've been craving a classical guitar for quite awhile, and still don't own one. But around New Years, I stumbled across the Yamaha Guitalele (GL-1) for around $100, and concluded that it might help me hold off the urge for a real classical for a bit longer.
In most respects, this is a real guitar. It's certainly not a toy, and is quite nicely made. The Guitalele name comes from the fact that it is similar in size to a ukelele, though it has 6 strings, and is tuned similar to a 6-string guitar.I say "similar", because due to the small size, the guitar is tuned like a guitar with a capo at the 5th fret, i.e. A-D-G-C-E-A, low to high.
It feels good in my hands. Frets are closer together, of course, actually very much like playing a guitar with capo.
The neck width at the nut is 1 7/8", the same as most classical guitars. The neck section is a shallow C that's comfortable in my hands and feels "right".
The guitalele is built in Indonesia, and workmanship seems very good. I don't see any sloppy glue work, and the inside of the instrument is very clean and well done. The nut is nicely rounded at the edges, and the frets are all smooth at the ends. The instrument is quite pleasant to play as a result.
The tone is relatively bright. The nylon strings and spruce top give it a relatively bright sound, not too different from a ukelele, though the lower strings bring out a lot more bass than a uke. The nato neck (aka eastern mahogany) and sonokeling (rosewood) fingerboard and bridge look and feel good. The neck meets the body at the 12th fret, like a classical guitar.
Intonation on the Yamaha guitalele is very good. I'm pretty down on cheap guitars these days, particularly because the intonation tends to be pretty poor, and they just don't sound very nice because of it. I've particularly been watching small guitars, because we have some kids in the family... and a cheap Denver 3/4 steel string guitar here turned out to be pretty bad.
After having found this guitalele, I'm thinking this might be a better choice for a first guitar for a small player, rather than buying a short scale regular guitar. The size is significantly smaller than something like a Baby Taylor [which I quite like], and may be a better choice for younger players.
The main thing I really like about playing an instrument like this is that the different voicing makes me instantly play things that I don't normally play on a regular guitar. Just that different tone and feel somehow inspire different music, which I find really great.
For $100, this is a great instrument. Small and portable, and cheap enough not to worry about it... shove it in the supplied gig bag and hit the road. It's small enough to fit in the car with other stuff and be available when you just want to pick up an instrument and play.
Of course, the final question is... did it convince me not to buy a "real" classical guitar? Well, I haven't bought one yet, so at least it postponed it a few months. But I'm still yearning for one, and I'll probably buy relatively soon. I have my eye on a La Patrie concert guitar (not a purist classical, since it's got a cutaway). But I certainly don't regret this little Yamaha purchase at all, and I expect it'll remain in regular rotation in the family for a long time to come.
What's wrong with paying for music?
Maybe I'm just a goody-goody who was brought up "right" and likes to follow the rules. Certainly I think of myself as Responsible. I find myself at a loss to understand how the whole music industry could be in such turmoil based on the widespread illegal downloading of music in bulk.
I try to stay connected with what's going on in the music industry, and I can certainly see that it's a real problem. Total music sales are way down. It's logical that CD sales have fallen off drastically with the availability of good online options for accessing music. But less logically to me, a lot of people seem to be resistant to paying for music downloads, despite the cost of music being the lowest ever. I guess I equate stealing music to driving down the side of the highway to bypass a traffic jam... it appears to put personal gain ahead of the good of society.
Personally, I still like to get my hands on a nice CD once in awhile, but I will admit there are few options to find a good selection of CDs at reasonable prices, particularly after the demise of Vancouver's A&B Sound a few years ago. So mostly I buy online, pretty much exclusively from iTunes. As a consumer, the shopping experience there is pretty good, the prices are better than brick and mortar stores, and of course there's the instant gratification factor.
I know quite a lot of people who claim music collections in the many tens of thousands of songs. My iTunes is a bit over 2500 songs, which I find to be quite a lot of music. And I find it hard to truly appreciate all the music I have, which leaves me scratching my head about how people can enjoy collections an order of magnitude bigger than that.
I loaded my whole CD collection into iTunes a number of years back and enjoyed listening to my music on the computer while I worked. The addition of an iPod made that experience much more mobile and enjoyable. For many years, I mostly played my tunes randomly, listening to whatever came up. Or skipping the tune if I wasn't in the mood for it.
My iPhone 3G has changed my habits a bit. With 16G for music, apps, photos, etc. I've found that I can't load all my music on the iPhone. So I have become somewhat brutal with it, and offload anything that gets less than 3 stars in my rating system, since I only have space for about 1500 songs. New music isn't rated, and gets on the iPhone until I've given it stars.
What I found interesting, though, was that I've also started listening to Albums a lot more than I did, and really getting a bit more into the "old" music experience. With so much music coming to us so easily, it's hard to get the level of appreciation I used to have for albums I'd had to save to buy. I used to listen to new albums many times, and read all the liner notes. In the past few years that wasn't happening for me, and I wasn't enjoying the new music I bought as much as in the old days. But my new focus on ensuring I listen to new stuff quite a few times is paying off in a deeper appreciation for that music. [I'm also thrilled that liner notes are starting to reappear in a lot of downloadable albums... Joe Bonamassa's Black Rock is a great example.]
A nice side-effect of the new technology, though, is that I can throw out the crappy tunes, and pare down albums after a number of listens to include only the material that I think is good. And I suspect that because I then don't have to listen to the mediocre tracks, I get more enjoyment out of the remainder of the album.
Of course, many good albums have little or no material that I dislike. But some others still turn out to be full of quite a few dogs, even though I've typically test listened to the 30-second samples on iTunes before buying.
I appreciate the huge effort it takes to make an album, and I want to ensure I support the artists who are creating great new music. It makes no sense to me to steal the material, when music is so important to my enjoyment of life. I probably get twice the new music per year now than I did 10 years ago, despite paying probably a similar amount of money. And right now, I'm probably enjoying that new music more than I did 10 years back, so to me this is win-win.